The complete Tale of the Eloquent Peasant has been preserved in separate elements amongst 4 papyeari that date from between 2061 and 1665 B.C.E. This story, about the peasant KhunAnup, raises necessary questions on the position of deities in the granting of justice. The text incorporates irony and even satire.
Khun-Anup, a peasant who lived in the Wadi Natrun area of Egypt, loaded up his donkeys with items and walked to the Nile Valley to commerce his wares. Along the riverbank, he met a person named Nemty-Nakht, who coveted the birds, herbs, and different objects KhunAnup had introduced. Nemty-Nakht had his servant stretch a fabric in the roadway. Rather than stroll on the linen, Khun-Anup drove his donkeys into the ﬁeld, and Nemty-Nakht accused him of trespassing. As the two males argued, one of Khun-Anup’s donkeys took a mouthful of Nemty-Nakht’s barley. NemtyNakht accused the peasant of stealing his barley, and he seized the donkeys and their load as compensation for the loss. When Khun-Anup threatened to go to the excessive steward, Rensi, Nemty-Nakht beat him.
For ten days, Khun-Anup pleaded with Nemty-Nakht to return his donkeys and items, to no avail. So Khun-Anup went on to the city the place Rensi lived. Rensi heard his grievance and denounced Nemty-Nakht to the magistrates, who weren't sympathetic. They believed that Khun-Anup was one of NemtyNakht’s peasants with an unjustiﬁed gripe.
Khun-Anup praised Rensi most poetically, pleading with him to settle the case. Rensi was so impressed with the peasant’s eloquence that he reported the incident to King Nebkaure. Intrigued, the king ordered Rensi not to give a solution to the peasant. Instead, Rensi was instructed to hold Khun-Anup pleading and file his speeches. Rensi was additionally to present the peasant and his household with what they wanted, with out letting them know the supply of their luck.
Khun-Anup made eight extra petitions earlier than Rensi, who didn't reply till after thethird petition. The response was the order thatKhun-Anup needs to be overwhelmed. In every petition, the peasant praised those that upheld maat (fact, justice, rightful order) and criticizedthose who turned their backs on it. KhunAnup’s pleas change into extra determined and private. By the eighth petition, he referred to as Rensi selﬁsh and a thief. Rensi, he stated, is likely to be an necessary man of wealth, however maat is everlasting. Khun-Anup begged Rensi to communicate and to comply with maat.
Finally, at the finish of his ninth petition, Khun-Anup accused the excessive steward of not listening. Unable to ﬁnd justice, Khun-Anup introduced that he would complain to the god of the useless, Anubis. (Certain students have interpreted this as a reference to suicide.) At this level, Rensi ordered the guards to carry KhunAnup in to see him. The peasant was afraid that this may be the finish of him.
Rensi had Khun-Anup’s speeches learn aloud and introduced to the king. King Nebkaure was significantly happy by the peasant’s ﬁne phrases. At final, the king ordered Rensi to make judgment in the case. Khun-Anup not solely recouped what he misplaced to Nemty-Nakht however was awarded some of his accuser’s belongings.